|
|
 |
Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)
|
  
 
Subject: value of 86 convt 116K miles?
From: "Raymond Prince" <r.l.prince(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: value of 86 convt 116K miles?
Lines: 11
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:00:48 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.76.244.147
________________________________________________
I`m looking at an 86 convt with 116,000 miles, it definitely needs new
paint, carpet, ragtop, weather-strips, antennae, gear on one headlight, tank
drained and new battery, due to being left sitting for almost a year.
The body itself is in good shape and it has an aero package with front dam,
side skirts, and rear fin about 3 inches high.
If the motor and drive train are in working order, what would a rough guess
at the price be?
Any help would be most appreciated.
RLP

SUBJECT: Re: value of 86 convt 116K miles?

From: Bob G. <rg327_remove_(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: value of 86 convt 116K miles?
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:16:17 -0400
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.169.49.2
________________________________________________
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:00:48 GMT, "Raymond Prince"
<r.l.prince(at)worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>I`m looking at an 86 convt with 116,000 miles, it definitely needs new
>paint, carpet, ragtop, weather-strips, antennae, gear on one headlight, tank
>drained and new battery, due to being left sitting for almost a year.
>The body itself is in good shape and it has an aero package with front dam,
>side skirts, and rear fin about 3 inches high.
>If the motor and drive train are in working order, what would a rough guess
>at the price be?
>Any help would be most appreciated.
>RLP
>
=======================
Easier to work backward on this on...
I personally have no problem with the miles...
But I can see you writing a few big checks for the paint (3-5K)
The top will set you back only a few hundred...but installation
another 3 hundred... The carpet I honestly can`t remember the prices
for weatherstripping is (double ouch honestly) ...
I think you are looking at at least 6K for cosmetic repairs..
In other words under 5 K is about all I would be willing to pay...
Bob Griffiths

From: Bob G. <rg327_remove_(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: value of 86 convt 116K miles?
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:16:17 -0400
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.169.49.2
________________________________________________
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:00:48 GMT, "Raymond Prince"
<r.l.prince(at)worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>I`m looking at an 86 convt with 116,000 miles, it definitely needs new
>paint, carpet, ragtop, weather-strips, antennae, gear on one headlight, tank
>drained and new battery, due to being left sitting for almost a year.
>The body itself is in good shape and it has an aero package with front dam,
>side skirts, and rear fin about 3 inches high.
>If the motor and drive train are in working order, what would a rough guess
>at the price be?
>Any help would be most appreciated.
>RLP
>
=======================
Easier to work backward on this on...
I personally have no problem with the miles...
But I can see you writing a few big checks for the paint (3-5K)
The top will set you back only a few hundred...but installation
another 3 hundred... The carpet I honestly can`t remember the prices
for weatherstripping is (double ouch honestly) ...
I think you are looking at at least 6K for cosmetic repairs..
In other words under 5 K is about all I would be willing to pay...
Bob Griffiths

From: RicSeyler <ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net>
Subject: Re: value of 86 convt 116K miles?
Lines: 33
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:02:36 -0500
________________________________________________
Top will run you about $800-1000 to have replaced....
Weather strips somewhere around $700 -$800.
Paint roughly $3-4 grand.
Carpet, I`d guess $600
Headlights somewhere around $250
Raymond Prince wrote:
>I`m looking at an 86 convt with 116,000 miles, it definitely needs new
>paint, carpet, ragtop, weather-strips, antennae, gear on one headlight, tank
>drained and new battery, due to being left sitting for almost a year.
>The body itself is in good shape and it has an aero package with front dam,
>side skirts, and rear fin about 3 inches high.
>If the motor and drive train are in working order, what would a rough guess
>at the price be?
>Any help would be most appreciated.
>RLP
>
>
>
>
--
Ric Seyler
Online Racing: RicSeyler
GPL Handicap 6.35
ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net
http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler
remove u2013SPAM- from email address
--------------------------------------
"Homer no function beer well without."
- H.J. Simpson
Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress: Title: Participants on 32nd Tannistest Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:46:43 +0000 Author: tannistest
Jury members participating 32nd Tannistest from 26th September to 2nd October 2009:
More on: http://tannistest.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/participants-on-32nd-tannistest/
____________________________________________
Title: Women drivers 'more likely to suffer parking stress' Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:09:08 +0000 Author: lucyhamshare
Its official, women are hopeless at driving. I know this will anger all those feminists out there, but unfortunately a survey of 4,200 drivers (men and women!) by insurance company elephant.co.uk has proved it. The survey found that female motorists are much more likely to suffer parking stress than men, particularly when someone else is watching them.
I’m afraid I have to agree with this survey. I am hideous at parking – I hardly ever reverse into a space, and if my boyfriend is in the car with me, I usually get him to park the car if it’s a particularly tight spot. And apparently I’m not alone, the survey found that women are twice as likely to ask someone else to park their car for them, and three-quarters admit that backing into a space is at times too tricky even when there is sufficient room. This compares to just 9% of men who admit they are useless at parallel parking and half who admit that reverse parking can be tricky.
Interestingly, earlier this year, the AA revealed that 34 per cent of drivers would fail on parallel parking if forced to retake their driving test.
Fortunately, many car makers, including Ford, Volkswagen and Mercedes, have wizened on to the fact that us girlies are useless at parking and have invented parking assist gadgets to help us out. Ford’s Parking Assist, for example, uses four ultrasonic sensors located in the rear bumper which are activated when the ignition is switched on and the reverse gear is selected. As the car is reversed the sensors detecte any obstacles behind the car and will alert a warning sound when the car gets too close. So if you own a Ford and you find yourself panicking at the thought of having to park your car, pop down to your local Ford dealer to find out more, and let those panic-stricken moments be a thing of the past and let’s beat those boys at parking!
More on: http://carsforgirls.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/women-drivers-more-likely-to-suffer-parking-stress/
| | |